Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 04:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info Emmeline Pankhurst, oil on canvas by Georgina Agnes Brackenbury. Created by National Portrait Gallery - uploaded by Madame Tatillonne - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2024 at 03:23:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class : Ostracoda (Ostracods)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Pictures of the Sun by ESA Solar Orbiter
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 21:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
The Sun in UV light of 17.4 nanometres, taken by Solar Orbiter's Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUI) instrument, assembled from multiple images taken on 22 March 2023.
-
A magnetogram of the Sun that shows the line-of-sight direction of the magnetic field on the Sun's disc, measured by the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023.
-
The velocity map of the Sun that shows the line-of-sight speed and direction of movement of material at the Sun's visible surface, measured by the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023.
-
The Sun Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) onboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft on 22 March 2023, at a wavelength of 617 nanometres.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Stars
- Info Created by ESA & NASA/Solar Orbiter/EUI Team, Image processing by Emil Kraaikamp (ROB) - uploaded by Artem.G - nominated by David Osipov -- David Osipov (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose I think some of these pictures are great but I don't see how they represent a valid or complete set. They are just unconnected pictures of the Sun by the same spacecraft, there is no governing theme for how they make sense together and complement each other. You should nominate the best ones separately and let us review them. Cmao20 (talk) 03:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your viewpoint. It's like, when we look at the Sun, we shouldn't just see a bright ball of light. We need to see all its sides, like with a cube, to truly grasp it. The magnetogram, the velocity map, the UV picture—they all reveal a different face of the Sun, helping us understand its power and complexity. Showing just one picture is like showing just one square of a cube - it doesn't represent the whole picture.
- I think representing the Sun in its full complexity needs more than just one image. Similar to how ancient cultures viewed the sun as a multifaceted entity, we should represent the Sun in its entirety. The rules, while important, shouldn't limit our ability to represent complex subjects like the Sun fully.
- So, even though the set isn't a traditional "set," it tells a complete story about the Sun. I believe it deserves to be featured as a whole because of this. David Osipov (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 19:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by Олександр Воропаєв - uploaded by Олександр Воропаєв - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Transfiguration Cathedral in Odesa. On July 23, 2023, the cathedral was severely damaged by a Russian missile attack. This is UNESCO World Heritage site in Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sad and high quality, I think it's a bit of a shame that we have the distracting shadowy figure of the second workman in the doorway, but not enough of a drawback not to support. Cmao20 (talk) 03:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Due to its high documentary value, the picture is worthy of promotion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 16:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Corvidae (Crows, Jays and Magpies)
- Info created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Bubulcus
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crazy eye :) --Rbrechko (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 06:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
- Info S-charl, bridge over the fast-flowing mountain stream Clemgia, a tributary of the Inn. The autumn colours are at their peak at S-Charl in Switzerland (altitude 1810 metres).
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Autumn colors make this photo spectacular. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 03:37:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great composition but I think the colours are a bit oversaturated Cmao20 (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2024 at 03:23:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Others
- Info created and uploaded by Radomianin - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the nomination, Екатерина Борисова. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I love this picture, it shows the photographer's talent to see beauty and grace in an ordinary street scene. This is the wow factor for me. The color combination is also wonderful here. Thank you for sharing this little masterpiece. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the appreciation, Екатерина Борисова. The picture was a real snapshot, we were first in a record store and then, as I recall, in a store next door, which we left with the friendly woman in red. During our walk through SF, my camera was always ready for spontaneous snapshots. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background, nothing special. Yann (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support When we want to show people walking on a city street the background will usually be busy; somehow the variety of the city must be included – if the background consists just of windows reflecting the sky or a wall we would not get the feeling that we are in the downtown. The vanishing lines of the row of cars on the left and of the buildings on the right, which converge above the centre of the picture, bring order to the composition; the woman seems to be walking towards this vanishing point, her placement slightly to the left adds tension to the composition. This placement, the bright colours of her clothing and the out-of-focus background make her stand out clearly from the background. For me, this is a good example of an intense, orderly and yet dynamic composition in the middle of the variety of a city centre. – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah I think it's great. The colours, the outfit, the sense of movement, all superb. Good street photography. Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 23:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_snow_sports
- Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop, background isnt so favourable. --Mile (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good sharpness for a pull along shot at that high resolution. --Granada (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sports photo which conveys an excellent impression of the tremendous speed of the ski jump thanks to the successful panning. The background is good, both for the panning (if the photo was taken against snow, the blue sky etc., we would not see the speed) and for the composition: the crossing diagonal lines make the composition interesting. – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing example of the panning technique. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 22:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space_exploration#Space_launch_vehicles
- Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BugWarp (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, for such photos getting the right moment is everything. Or almost everything: I wonder why Bill Ingalls (given that he is/was a professional photographer) did not pay more attention to details, both in the composition (which he could have checked calmly before the start) and in the post-processing (which is done later). We can accept the leaning verticals, but the cropped flowers at the bottom are unsatisfying (either there should be more of them in the frame or they should have been cut off completely), the CAs are obvious and (given the low resolution) quite prominent. And the whole image, which has been underexposed to preserve the highlights, should have been brightened in post-processing. Given the incredible expenditure necessary for space missions, one could expect a bit more care from the photographer, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm pretty sure this specific type of picture is taken remotely. The focal length is 16mm in full frame, it's unlikely a person would be allowed this close to a rocket launch. Chromatic aberration might have been corrected, I agree. I know what you mean about preservation of highlights and underexposure, but I think the key to this picture being "wow" are the dramatic steam clouds. To make them dramatic, you need the darker shadows within them. Even if you correct the levels to enhance the dark foreground with flowers, you might make the vapor cloud less dramatic and therefore the photo less "wow". Of course, it's possible to make a feathered selection of the grass/flowers area and correct it while preserving dramatic vapor, but I'm not sure it's allowed for journalistic type of photos from NASA. Tupungato (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 21:12:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created & uploaded by Anthony's astro - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's of course a beautiful picture at thumbnail but when looking closer at the separation between the sky and land I wonder if the background is real or if it is a photomontage of a sky photographed from another place/angle/time. The file description says the file was taken by putting a camera on a tripod and taking 30sec exposure shots and assembling them, which would mean that the background is supposed to really have been behind that foreground. But the author is the same one than this church picture that was recently delisted for having undeclared photo manipulations (fake background) and having misled votes. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Explicit abstention in line with Giles' analysis and reasoning. Personally, I'm tired of undisclosed manipulations on this forum, just recently I fell for a manipulation in my nomination of someone else's picture, which the author didn't really admit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. We shouldn't promote any more images from this user given the risk that they could be photomontages. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think we have to judge the picture and not the author. If the author shows us the original raw of this image and that he proves that it's not a photomontage, this picture (and other proven real pictures) should still be able to be promoted in my opinion -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also this one by "AstroAnthony" is clearly a fake. There might be many other manipulations by this uploader (I don't want to waste hours examining each with a magnifying glass). It is not worth risking another time-consuming delisting process after potential POTY qualification like the previous case. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, if the author could provide the RAWs I would be happy to reconsider, but I think it's fair to assume that images by this user may be photomontages, particularly if they look 'too good to be true', and to vote accordingly. Cmao20 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 17:02:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created by Otto Domes - uploaded by Otto Domes - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really nice. One of the few instances where black and white really works, because it focusses the eye on shapes and forms. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The moment when an arrangement of everyday tools resembles an artwork; black and white definitely helps here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas --Rbrechko (talk) 12:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful interplay of light and shadow, with good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 12:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question male? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose we are probably spoilt with crispy sharpness and detail of Lepidopteras here, this one is below the bar, the eye is blurry, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco, unfortunately this is not sharp, even though the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, very beautiful and well-composed, but just too soft (maybe the AF missed the focus?). – Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow + unsharp. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 09:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo of a charming timber-framed house in very authentic condition. The storks on the roof are a nice extra and so typical for the Alsace. – Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2024 at 07:32:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
- Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per comments on your previous stained glass nomination I think these images have the contrast and saturation pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. I don't like stained glass done like this. I prefer images like this and this which I feel manage the light conditions a lot better. Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support On the one hand I prefer like Cmao20 more subtle photos of stained-glass windows (see Cmao20’s example links). On the other hand I think I remember that the two stained-glass windows in the Pazzi Chapel have indeed very saturated colours (cf. category), and we have many FPs of stained-glass windows in this more traditional style. There is a good reason for that: photographing stained glass is tricky because of the high contrast, it’s hard to protect both the pastel colours of the highlights and the very dark shadows. When we also consider the difficult circumstances (the window is high on the wall and the Chapel is often a crowded place), I think we can still call this a good and useful reproduction of the window. – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I wouldn't vote for any of the stained glass images in the 'traditional style' either. I did vote for one a bit like this in 2019 but I was very new to Commons then and didn't know much about this type of photography. I would oppose that image now. Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 22:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light + composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support lovely composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very pleasing composition, beautiful contrast between blue hour outside and warm lighting inside. – Aristeas (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 19:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
- Info Two wood knots which resemble two eyes in the wooden fence at the north side of the plot Lembergerstrasse no. 13, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. All by – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this simple example of pareidolia along with the rich texture of the aged wood. Two fellows have told me that they particularly like this photo, so I’m going to give it a try. What do you think? – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What do I think? Mmmm. It's a knotty problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The eyes look so big that you can imagine the mouth open :) Great example of pareidolia, similar to this sad one from your archive. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support it's really cool how this resembles a pair of eyes. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 17:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
- Info A courtyard and workers’ houses below high factory chimneys in Nikiszowiec, Katowice, Poland. Between 1908 and 1918 Nikiszowiec was built for the workers of a coal mine according to the plans of the architects Emil and Georg Zillmann. Today the neighbourhood is a listed architectural monument. Created and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like very much how this photo illustrates the life in the shadow of tall factory chimneys; this effect is enforced by the contrast of the huge chimneys with the playground equipment in the middle ground, and the subdued light of the evening sun also fits in well with this impression. – Seems that during the Wikimania 2024 in Katowice two of our fellows visited this neighbourhood at the same time; Frank Schulenburg took a very similar photo and it was hard to decide between the two. In the end I have opted for Radomianin’s image because IMHO the portrait (vertical) format and the steep diagonal of the footpath ending in the bottom right corner make the composition more dynamic and emphasize the height of the chimneys better. – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When we went on the photo tour, we were just in time to catch the evening light. Personally, I like the contrast between the houses, the safe haven of the people, which is in complete contrast to the monstrous industrial architecture represented by the chimneys. I also like the lines, including the contrails, which create a kind of convergence. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I went to another of the tours to this place - I wish I had captured the atmosphere there as well as Radomianin did! --Kritzolina (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 09:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 11:00:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Aegithalidae (Long-tailed Tits)
- Info created by Jerzy Strzelecki - uploaded by Jerzy Strzelecki - nominated by Jerzystrzelecki -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Although I'm not sure if everything possible has been done with the denoising, I think this is a great photo! --Superbass (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely not, Superbass, I gave it a try, see here, I think that there is room for improvement here. Jerzystrzelecki you are free to offer this version as an alternative or upload it over your version if you like, whatever you like (or do nothing, that's also fine with me). --Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For now, we need here some kind of improvement, you are of course also welcome to reprocess it on your own. Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Really lovely, excellent posture and composition. But I agree with Poco a poco that the processing should be improved. A new processing from the raw image file (an ARW file in your case) would be the perfect solution (I could help you with this if you want – I have used the same camera and use the same lens). But Poco a Poco’s version (thanks!) is already a solid improvement and even ready for use for you, so it would be the easiest solution. – Aristeas (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Will support Poco's version, but not this one. Cmao20 (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 08:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus
- Info White-tailed eagle at the Bavarian Hunting Falconry Center in Tambach Castle Wildlife Park during the birds of prey flight demonstration. All by me. -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good light and subject in action perfectly frozen at high speed -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support It looks worse in thumbnail, but it is really well done. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support----Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 07:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Class : Ostracoda (Ostracods)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting, and detailed information provided. --Yann (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
- Info Reformed earth church in Scuol. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-built church in imposing landscape, solid quality. – Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a white spot left of the tower --Llez (talk) 09:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support As for me it would be nice to have a little bit more space at the bottom, but anyway I like this photo. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 05:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, focus on both, and smooth homogeneous background -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Top Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp, very elegant, congrats! – Aristeas (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2024 at 01:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info Nice landscape with cool wispy clouds from an underrepresented part of the world at FPC. created by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - uploaded by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- I love these landscapes.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice contrast between the greenery and the snow. --Yann (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Splendid landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support splendid landscape; K is so beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 22:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual and sensitive composition. Great work. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 21:23:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Named after British explorer Joseph Thomson, this is the most common type of gazelle in East Africa with numbers over 200,000. It's claimed to have top speeds up to 80–90 km/h (50–55 mph), making it the fourth-fastest land animal, after the cheetah (its main predator), pronghorn, and springbok. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be more centered for my taste but good quality.--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If this was my nomination, it would have been opposed as being undercategorized. Better add Category:Eudorcas thomsonii (male)! Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of votes are just a provocation, Charles, don't bother. There is also an oppose in my second nom and I'm not really sure why. Btw, PierreSelim took care of the cat, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo of this elegant creature. – Aristeas (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Personally, I find this positioning according to the rule of thirds better than a centered solution. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The head is where it is but the body is in the center. I would call this a (successful) centered composition, with moderate lead room and margins equal to a third approximately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the further review regarding the lead room. I'm curious, would the diagonal method work here? -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure Poco holds a lot of secrets :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you may be disappointed. I know the theory but I have to say that at the end of the day I played around with the crop and chose this one because it dwas the most pleasant to me. It doesn't fullfil the rule of 2/3 or the diagonal method, though. Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent capture of an animal in the wild, with uniform background. Looking at viewer -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 20:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Man dressed as the pagan god Veles at the traditional Rękawka festival in Kraków. All by me -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm captivated by this unusual portrait. If you compare it to similar ones from the series in the category, it really is the best. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing mask portrait in good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 19:46:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info Abandoned Ford E-Series van by Gerritsen Creek in Brooklyn, New York. I like the mix between urban waste and nature at the edge of a city. I was torn which to nominate, this one or this wider view that includes a glimpse of Manhattan, but I think making the van the subject probably works best. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting branches. This derelict vehicle with graffiti has its own charm, but as FP, the unbalanced tight crop at the right, cluttered by branches interfering with the composition in the foreground, make the viewpoint awkward, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Basile Morin, sorry but I do think the branches are distracting, great subject but unsure about composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Before nominating, I uploaded a version with the branches removed, but wound up reverting as it seemed like a bit much. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For me, this is an interesting image that I would support without the branches. I took the liberty and created a proposal from the revision at 19:35 on 25 November 2024. Please see the SwissTransfer link. Modifications made: fixed retouching remnants on the top right. From the left side I cropped 300 px and made a slight level adjustment to give the sky a bit more weight. This is just a suggestion that you are welcome to use for an update if the result is acceptable for you and the community. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Info This is the retouched version, with branches on the right removed, as edited by Radomianin (thanks!). I uploaded it as a separate file to allow for an alternative. Pinging other voters so far: @Basile Morin and Cmao20: — Rhododendrites talk | 14:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The image not only conveys the problem of environmental pollution, it also has an "apocalyptic aftertaste". Thank you for the alternative upload, I personally find this crop the most appealing. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support this one is much better. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by Greg Henshall/FEMA, uploaded by Consequentially, nominated by Yann
- Info Greensburg, Kansas, USA, May 16, 2007. The center of town twelve days after it was hit by an F5 tornado with 200 mph (approx. 321 km/h) winds.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Someone has leant on the 'clarity' slider, sadly. I am unsure whether historical value/irreplaceability outweighs the poor photo editing. Cmao20 (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain I would even accept the clarity filtering (HDR-ization), but the whole image is somewhat greenish-yellowish tinted. After adjusting white balance, it might be good. --Tupungato (talk) 12:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Tupungato: This image can't be changed, as it is going to be featured on the English Wikipedia, but I could propose an alternative. Yann (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen
- Info Quite a common bird these days in Europe. FPs of an adult's head and of a chick. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as long as not sufficiently COM:CAT'egorized --A.Savin 16:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't you just let the one do it whose job it actually is? --A.Savin 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain the reason for the continued oppose vote A.Savin. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das behalte ich mir bei falscher und/oder unvollständiger Kategorisierung Ihrerseits auch weiter ausdrücklich vor. --A.Savin 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Google translate says this means I reserve the right to do so in the event of incorrect and/or incomplete categorization on your part. But I have no idea what is wrong now. Can ANYBODY help please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das behalte ich mir bei falscher und/oder unvollständiger Kategorisierung Ihrerseits auch weiter ausdrücklich vor. --A.Savin 15:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain the reason for the continued oppose vote A.Savin. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't you just let the one do it whose job it actually is? --A.Savin 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
And what is wrong?Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- Support What a lovely composition. I would also like to know what is wrong with the categories as this might help me in future nominations, it isn't clear to me what is wrong with this at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 01:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and composition. Category Ducklings added. Interesting mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping. I have replaced ducklings (=ducks; not geese) with another category. It is worth noting that the category structure of this species uses the word feral which is incorrect. Most of these geese are wild from introduced birds and are not feral. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your update and sorry for my confusion. It's the idea of "juvenile" that I wanted to introduce and I was also thinking that you would easily find the relevant subcategory. But it's a different branch and you're more than expert :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and charming family photo. – Aristeas (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Would the castle and reflection be more interesting than the foreground grass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks interesting for me, otherwise I wouldn't have nomitated this photo. But I can be wrong because it's always difficult to evaluate own work. --Rbrechko (talk) 10:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I actually really like the contrast provided by the foreground. It could be a little sharper but still very good IMO Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasant light and colors. The background only would also make a beautiful picture, horizontally -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. Tiny isolated hut in a green environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South Korea
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting but lacking that special thing to make it extraordinary IMHO --Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. It's a pretty street surrounded by authentic hanok houses in Seoul, and I was lucky that evening to find it deserted after a sunny day -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support To be honest I know what Poco means. I don't much like the fact that the road has been tarmacced over. Nevertheless, interesting enough for FP and nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 22:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, great colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition with vanishing point and nice lights at an appealing time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 21:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info Landscape in the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve in the Zakarpattia Oblast. One of my favorites from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Estolyarov - nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great landscape panorama in which, in my opinion, everything is somehow coherent and doesn't need any big words. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Foreground and background are in focus due to the very wide depth of field. Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing much to complain about. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous — Rhododendrites talk | 20:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful highland landscape with excellent light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support very nice! --PierreSelim (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 11:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info created by Rolf Kranz - uploaded by Rolf Kranz - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mystical foggy atmosphere, good candidate and deserved 4th place at WLM. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m happy to see that the creator has improved the post-processing of his photos. While some of his WLM photos in the last years suffered from unfortunate post-processing, e.g. strong oversharpening, this photo has been handled with care and taste. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - uploaded by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking red facade and pink combination with the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful atmospheric light and sky. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 21:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good idea to do a vertical pano Cmao20 (talk) 22:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! Also good to see variety in your nominations. A vertical strip of the milky way galaxy in this case :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The black foreground is too big, and there is nothing interesting there (compared with File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg). Cropping that would improve the picture. Yann (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I will crop approximately half of the foreground this evening once I'll have access to my computer -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done: new version uploaded with bottom cropped. What do you think now Yann? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, better. --Yann (talk) 07:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done: new version uploaded with bottom cropped. What do you think now Yann? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I will crop approximately half of the foreground this evening once I'll have access to my computer -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The new crop (or some middle course between the old and the new crop) improves the image. – Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Aristeas. Subtle sky and mountains. (But why don't you paste a church to get a POTY award? :-)) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's lovely Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Happy end :-) I checked the restoration work and find it well handled, given the difficulty.
- Photographically the focus is wrong (and the crop tight at the left), it's a shame, but this image has its own story (and yes, also own article on en-wiki). It has become an iconic photograph. We should take this into account.
- Finally, a reminder about the voting process. COM:FPC: The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations... -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral
{{s}}--Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)- I change my position since no answer has arrived to the questions below. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. Surprised this is still picking up support votes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What are these red and green stripes? The picture also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Finally no, per others. Yann (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with the reviewers that the image looks relatively colorful compared to other images of the Milky Way. So far I have no experience with this kind of photography. But as I remember from the weather reports, there were some unusual aurora observations in Germany in August this year. Maybe that influenced this photo, but I'm just guessing. @Zwiebackgesicht: I took the liberty of creating a version with less saturation, a little less noise, and more sharpening. I also applied the sRGB color profile to ensure a consistent display on most monitors. The file was saved in the slowest mode, which reduced the file size by 20 MB while maintaining the same quality. Please see the SwissTransfer link 1/2. This is just a suggestion to be helpful, if this version is an improvement for the community and for you, please feel free to use it for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is certainly a lot better, but I don't know how much of the colours here are trustworthy. It's hard to know how far the original manipulations went and thus how far they should be reversed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The contrast is still completely exagerated and inaccurate and the colors are still not real, you never get colors like that with a picture of the milky way -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to Cmao20 and Giles for your evaluations. It is difficult to adjust saturation and level values based on guesswork when the original file is not available. But I didn't want to leave it untried. I created a second version in which I reduced the brightness, contrast and saturation values significantly: SwissTransfer link 2/2. There are still a few days left until the end of the nomination period and I'm still hoping that the author will respond with his personal feedback. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The green and red colors in the sky still come out of nowhere and don't exist in reality. There's also many blue weird zones in the black zones that look like it was painted (I think they are remains of the painting brush used to darken the sky). The whites also seem a bit too illuminated. And also the black part of the sky is underexposed in my opinion (but underexposed because of the way it was edited by painting it darker and not by the way of taking the photo). I think the image has to be reworked from raw because the way it was edited to make everything else than the milky way much darker probably caused details to be lost there -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your insightful remarks, Giles. You're right, without the raw file we can't make any progress here. It's a pity that the author/nominator hasn't responded yet. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if improvements can be made in this case, I think working from the RAW file would be better. At least to see from where we start -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Giles –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dark but very nice IMHO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support After some reflection and thought, I agree with Giles' evaluation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of detail too low in the dark areas, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportIt could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huh, the version since the edits you've made appears way sharper to me. Strange that. Great candidate now Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNeutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent viewpoint but the lighting still kinda spoils it. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. --Harlock81 (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
- Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
- Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Crop is strange.--Mile (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Can you suggest an improvement please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. Its not 1st time you put almost in the middle. Negative space should be in relation with subject. --Mile (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks; I've adopted your suggestion Mile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think its better than before. --Mile (talk) 09:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 24 Nov → Fri 29 Nov Mon 25 Nov → Sat 30 Nov Tue 26 Nov → Sun 01 Dec Wed 27 Nov → Mon 02 Dec Thu 28 Nov → Tue 03 Dec Fri 29 Nov → Wed 04 Dec
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 20 Nov → Fri 29 Nov Thu 21 Nov → Sat 30 Nov Fri 22 Nov → Sun 01 Dec Sat 23 Nov → Mon 02 Dec Sun 24 Nov → Tue 03 Dec Mon 25 Nov → Wed 04 Dec Tue 26 Nov → Thu 05 Dec Wed 27 Nov → Fri 06 Dec Thu 28 Nov → Sat 07 Dec Fri 29 Nov → Sun 08 Dec
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.